RSS/BJP leaders have shamed Patel by guillotining Article 370
One of the "truths" manufactured in the boudhik shivirs (ideological training camps) of the RSS is that it was Jawaharlal Nehru who forced Article 370 on India while Sardar Patel, the first home minister of India was opposed to it.The RSS leaders both inside the Modi government and outside blame Jawaharlal Nehru ceaselessly“as the sole architect of Article 370”, giving Kashmir special status. Now, after this Article was guillotined on August 5, 2019, prime minister Modi is being eulogized as the one great leader who has completed Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel’s dream of 'Ek Bharat'. Ram Madhav, the current prominent ideologue of both the RSS and BJP declared that a "Historic blunder committed by Nehru (has) finally (been) corrected."[i]The RSS also claims that removal of the Article 370 is the realisation of the dream of 'martyr' like Syama Prasad Mukherjee who laid down his life for full integration of Kashmir with India.
Thus,the RSS/BJP regime claims that it was Jawaharlal Nehru who was solely responsible for inserting Article 370 in the Indian Constitution despite Sardar Patel's opposition. This is an atrocious claim even an iota of which is not corroborated by the contemporary official documents specially those documents which originated from the office of Sardar Patel, independent India’s first home minister. Quite to the contrary, a deep dive into a plethora of these documents that concern the accession of Kashmir to India reveal that Sardar Patel was very part of the constitutional process through which Article 370 was inserted in the Constitution. Let us revisit some of the crucial ones to know how maliciously Nehru is being presented as the villain of Article 370.
Sardar Patel Facilitated adoption of Article 370 by the Constituent Assembly while Nehru was in the US on an Official Tour
Vidya Shankar, a senior ICS (predecessor of IAS) was private secretary to Sardar (1946-50) and was Patel's most trusted advisor. He compiled and edited Sardar Patel's correspondence in two bulky volumes which are regarded as the most authentic record of Sardar's ideas and works.
Shankar, in his introductory note to the section of correspondence on Jammu and Kashmir (chapter 3), in fact, sings the praises of Sardar for getting the Article 370 passed, despite hurdles. It is through Shankar’s meticulous contemporary documentation,that we know that, at the time of Article 370 being passedby the Constituent Assembly of India (CA), Nehru was not in India, being away to USA on official visit.
"One of Sardar's notable achievements in relation to Jammu and Kashmir was the addition of Article 370 of the Constitution of India, which defines the relation of the State to India. This matter was handled by Gopalaswami Ayyangar in consultation with Shiekh Abdullah and his Ministry and with the approval of Pandit Nehru. Although Nehru was himself away in the United States, at the time, his approval had been taken in advance to the draft formula. But Sardar had not been consulted. The Congress party in the Constituent Assembly was strongly, even violently, opposed to the draft article which gave a special position to the State. On principle, opinion in the party was that Kashmir should accept the Constitution on the same terms as other States; and in particular the provision that basic articles, e. g. Fundamental Rights as enshrined in the Constitution would not apply to the State was greatly resented. Gopalaswami Ayyangar failed to carry conviction and sought Sardar's intervention. Sardar was anxious, in the absence of Nehru, that nothing should be done which would appear as letting him down. In the absence of Nehru Sardar, therefore, undertook the task of persuading the party to change stand. He carried out the task with such success that in the Assembly there was not much discussion, and no much discussion, and no opposition to the Article (370)."[ii]
Thus Sardar actively participated in formulating the Article 370 and getting nod of the Constituent Assembly. He corroborated this fact in a letter to Nehru dated November 3, 1949 when he wrote that
"There was some difficulty about the provision relating to Kashmir…I could persuade the party to accept all the changes except the last one, which was modified so as to cover not merely the first Ministry so appointed but any subsequent Ministries which may be appointed under that proclamation".[iii]
Manufacturing History, the RSS Way
Article 370 (originally numbered 306A) came for discussion before the CA on October 17, 1949 with President of the CA, Dr Rajendra Prasad in the chair. Gopalaswami Ayyangar moved the resolution by reading the proposed Article with a long comment. In the course of debate only one member, Maulana Hasrat Mohani drew attention towards discrimination meted to the ruler of Baroda State. He stated:
"Sir, I want to make it clear at the very outset that I am neither opposed to all these concessions being granted to my Friend Sheikh Abdullah, not am I opposed to the acceptance of the Maharaja as the ruler of Kashmir. And if the Maharaja of Kashmir gets further powers and concessions I will be very glad…But may I ask a question? When you make all these concessions for Kashmir I most strongly object to your arbitrary act of compelling the Baroda State to be merged in Bombay. The administration of Baroda state is better than the administration of many other Indian Provinces. It is scandalous that you should compel the Maharaja of Baroda to have his raj merged in Bombay and himself pensioned off. Some people say that he himself voluntarily accepted this meager. I know it is an open secret that he was brought form England and compelled against his will..."[iv]
At this point Dr Rajendra Prasad intervened] "Maulana, we are not concerned with the Maharaja of Baroda here" to which Maulana responded with the following words:
"Well, I would not go into any detail. But I say that I object to this sort of thing. If you grant these concessions to the Maharaja of Kashmir you should also withdraw your decision about the merger of Baroda into Baroda into Bombay and allow all these concessions and many more concessions to the Baroda ruler also."[v]
Shockingly, Ram Madhav uses only three words of Mohani's comment “Why this discrimination?" to prove in a true Goebbelsian traditionthat even a Maulana had raised questions about the discriminatory nature of the Article 370![vi] On the contrary, Maulana was not only supporting the Article 370 but also demanding such provisions for Baroda ruler who despite running an enlightened government was removed from his position and his State forced to merge with Bombay.
Sardar Patel, Shyama Prasad Mukherjee & other Hindu Members of the CA agreed to Article 370
The factory of historical lies and manipulation that the RSS manufactures, consciously tries to keep under wraps, the actual debate on the Article 370 in the CA. It took just less than half a day for the CA to admit Article 370 in the Constitution and apart from Dr Rajendra Prasad and Gopalaswami Ayyangarsenior Hindu leaders, namely, Pandit Thakurdas Bhargava, RK Sidhwa, Pandit Hirday Nath Kunzuru, K Santhanam and Mahavir Tyagiparticipated in the discussion; none opposed its ratification. Significantly, many of the members were known as Hindu nationalists. More importantly, Syama Prasad Mukherjee was also a member of the CA and signed the Constitution on November 26, 1949 with Article 370 intact. He did not think it fit even to mildly express his unease against the special status of Jammu & Kashmir. Such an unease was expressed by another member of the CA, a Hindu nationalist, Jaspat Roy Kapoor while discussing the Draft Constitution on November, 21, 1949. He had said: "I only wish that Kashmir should also have been brought in on the same level as other States but, unfortunately, much to our dissatisfaction and chagrin, if I may say so, this would not be done. This is a delicate subject and I will not say anything more on it."[vii] But Mukherjee was silent.
Task for Congress
It is the Congress, one expected, with this history that should have confronted the Hindutva Goebbels in and outside Parliament, especially since they were falsifying its own history on the question of Article 370. Tragically, it was some of the leading, young Congress members of Parliament who have fallen prey to the divisive game of RSS by voting with the government. A senior Congress leader, Maharaja Karan Singh son of Maharaja Hari Singh has also support the abrogation of Article 370. This has caused further dismay among Indians who have faith in the democratic-secular Constitution of India.
In these circumstances, it is a matter of some solace to history, that the Congress as a party stood in defence of the Indian Constitution. But it should have been more proactive in resisting the RSS/BJP Juggernaut's narrative that it was Nehru and Nehru alone, who single-handedly “forced” Article 370 on the Indian nation. Congress should have confronted Amit Shah with contemporary documented facts. When the CA gave green signal to Article 370 Nehru was away from the country and Sardar Patel facilitated its adoption.Those who hold Nehru responsible for it are, in fact, denigrating 299Honourable members of the CA (which included Sardar Patel and Syama Prasad Mukherjee) as if they were the bonded labourers of Nehru!Can the RSS/BJP produce one statement either from Sardar Patel or Mukherjee (who was minister in the first Nehru ministry from August, 15, 1947 to April 6, 1950) disowning this Article? Can the Hindutva rulers prove that both these leaders did not sign the Constitution as members of the CA since it contained Article 370?
It is a brazen denigration of the whole process and history of the Constituent Assembly. Nehru becomes a punching bag for the far, supremacist right, sitting in power with a brute majority, because the Congress itself, which carries Nehru’s legacy and is expected to defend his democratic and secular heritage is passing through a stage of inexplicable inertia, bordering on disintegration. This could be caused by an ignorance of the Congress’ own glorious past. What is at stake is not just the survival of the Congress or any other party but the survival of our constitutional polity. Does the Congress leadership realise that ?
Link for J & K accession to India original documents:
1.Know The Shameless Betrayal Of Quit India Movement By Savarkar, Syama Prasad Mukherjee And RSS Through Their Own Documents
[ii]Shankar, V, (ed.), Select Correspondence of Sardar Patel 1945-50, vol. 1, Navjivan Publishing House, Ahmedabad, 1977, pp. 220-21.
[iii]Letter reproduced in Shankar, V, (ed.), Select Correspondence of Sardar Patel 1945-50, vol. 1, Navjivan Publishing House, Ahmedabad, 1977, p. 373.
[iv]Constituent Assembly Debates, vol. X, Lok Sabha Secretariat, Delhi, 2003 [4th reprint], pp. 421-429.
[v]Constituent Assembly Debates, vol. X, Lok Sabha Secretariat, Delhi, 2003 [4th reprint], pp. 421-429.
[vii]Constituent Assembly Debates, vol. XI, Lok Sabha Secretariat, Delhi, 2003 [4th reprint], p. 762.